Marketing, disruptive technologies, & the Embrace infant warmer

20,000,000 babies are born prematurely every year and 4 million die. That's 450 every hour. 1 every 8 seconds. So begins the pitch from a relatively new nonprofit called Embrace. Their focus is creating affordable technologies for low income communities in the developing world that improve health and save lives. Their mission in their words:

Designed by students in a Stanford class called Entreprenurial Design for Extreme Affordability, the infant warmer you see above costs less than 1% of traditional incubators. And it works where there's no electricity. Here's how it works:

Simplicity is a key factor in successfully designing technology-centric products for poor communities. Which begs the questions: Doesn't simplicity also sell in the U.S. and other "developed" countries? So is there a market for this infant warmer in our hospitals for less sick babies, or for home use which would allow families to transition from hospital to home sooner? Same story for GE's handheld electrocardiogram device (designed for emerging markets) that I blogged about in a prior post

From the work we've been doing over the years with medical device companies and their customers, the answer is a resounding YES.

And BTW, Embrace has many partners, but none from the med device industry. I smell opportunity!

Talk about a niche market

Media_httpassetsnydailynewscomimg20090715algpetplanejpg_gcrptdbjxhnbyij
The first "pet only" airline in the U.S. is flying. Pet Airways have outfitted their planes for pets only, along with special pet lounges in the airports they use. Dogs and cats travel in the main climate-controlled cabin with special attendants and anywhere/anytime bathroom privileges.

One news story quoted a customer justifying the investment for her dog: "He's a member of our family," she said. "He's certainly not cargo and he's not a suitcase."

A quick analysis might suggest that launching a new company with a new luxury service in an industry that is in terrible shape during a severe recession might not be a great idea. Or... is there enough demand among  extreme pet lovers with discretionary income to make Pet Airways a success?

Personally, I love my dog Lukie.

But he's still a dog. It may be a sweet idea, but my guess is Pet Airways won't fly for long. Not knowing their capitalization, I give them two years.

What's your guesstimate?